Saturday, February 9, 2019
Millers Irony and the Truth about American Witch Hunts Essay -- Polit
Silence has pervaded every imaginable recess in the old deserted court of lawhouse. A hundred silent onlookers hold their breath in baited anticipation. Suddenly, the deadening sound that only wood can make as it slams into an desk echoes for what whitethorn as well be all eternity. A single adult male garners the attention of two hundred eyes as he by chance clears his throat. However his lips only are able to take form almost one bloodcurdling word guilty. Although of what crime depends on the time level of the aforementioned case, for trials such as these have occurred in American explanation not once just now twice. The first began back in the 1600s in a little town known as capital of Oregon Massachusetts, where slew were killed for crimes of witchcraft. The second instance, while not quite as known for bestowing callousness mortis still put ruin on the lives of many. Trials in the 1950s fueled by McCarthyism and the idea that communism was invading the United S tates led to the blacklisting of many mess as speculate socialists. Arthur Miller saw the real story of the trials for supposed unamericans during his time and he set about making it known to the public. However, had milling machine outright stated his views he would have found himself in the equal position as those whos stories he tried to tell. Therefore he devised a creative solution he wrote a story based on events in the Salem witch trials that is nearly perfectly symbolic of the McCarthyism trials. Millers enormous use of satire in the crucible reveals the actual motives behind events carried out during the Salem witch trials, and thereby he exposes the dark truth of what happened during 1950s McCarthyism trials on Unamerican activities. rase in the very beginning Miller wastes no time in d... ... in the court goes back to the confession of John proctor. He at last admits to his sin after months of concealing it and then Danforth and the court bluntly declare to h im she spoke nothing of lechery, and this man has lied. (113?) This shows that when an actual bit of truth is presented to the lawmen, they obviate it and again side with the liars. The situational irony lies in the fact that when Proctor confesses his sin, the court rejects his confession altogether on only the evidence of his wifes claim. These three examples of irony are perhaps the most important of all in resemblance to McCarthyism. They reveal that the court itself may represent unfairness in its proceedings. (jr 23?) Miller urges his readers to believe that the judges not only believed liars and rejected the truth, but also that they pushed for the convictions rather than a fair trial.